Re: application number format in WPI on Dialog

MREES@derwent.co.uk
Tue, 16 Jul 1996 10:07:13 +0100

This is a Mime message, which your current mail reader
may not understand. Parts of the message will appear as
text. To process the remainder, you will need to use a Mime
compatible mail reader. Contact your vendor for details.

--IMA.Boundary.351805738
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Description: cc:Mail note part

Dear Kazimierz

Thanks for your questions. It is apparent that in file 411
(Dialindex), the only number formats available are the Dialog
standard format (CC NNNN), hence the reason that you did not find
anything. If you search directly in Derwent World Patents Index
(350 and 351), both the other formats are acceptable.

Incidentally we are currently reloading the database on Dialog as
file 352 and will be further standardising the application number
formats. Full details will be available at the end of Summer.

Regards

Martin Rees
mrees@derwent.co.uk

------------------------------------------------------------------
I recently searched on Dialog the WPI database for a British patent
application No. 7259 filed in 1978. According to Derwent's booklet
"DWPI Tools of the Trade for Dialog" (08/28/95 revision), the
_only_ recommended format for searching application numbers in WPI
on Dialog is:

YYCC-NNNNNNN

where YY is the YEAR of application,
CC is the COUNTRY CODE, and
NNNNNNN is the _seven digit_ serial number.

The booklet further says that "if you have less than seven digits,
backfill with zeros from the dash for each missing digit".

Following this recommendation, I reviewed the application number
index of the database (using the Dialindex, file 411), looking for
the entry
78GB-0007259

only to realize that this format apparently does not apply to
British applications. So I looked to my old manual "Derwent: WPI on
Dialog Training" (5th printing, August 1987 revision) to find that
British applications at that time were apparently indexed in the
following two formats:

1. Derwent format: YYCC-NNNNNN

where NNNNNN is a _six_ digit serial number ("padded" with
leading zeroes, when necessary), and

2. Dialog format: CC YYNNN...

where NNN... is a serial number of undetermined (?)
length (i.e., which does not require backfilling
with zeroes to any predetermined length).

So I went back to the index, this time looking for either

78GB-007259
or
GB 787259

Again, it appeared that the first of those two formats no longer
applied to British applications. I found, however, an entry under
the second format, which proved to be the record I was looking for.

I have to admit (as will be clear from the above) that I have
never diligently followed possible changes to application number
format and indexing policies which may have been introduced by
Derwent (or Dialog) during the last ten years or so, so that this
experience raised two questions in my mind:

1. How universally applicable is the application number format
YYCC-NNNNNNN recommended for searching on Dialog by Derwent
(seven digit serial number, backfilled with zeroes, when
necessary)?

2. If there is no one-for-all format, what is the best place to
find out the right format(s) for a given country, other than a
trial and error review of online indices (or, possibly,
reviewing some old searches to find a correct format in an
actual record)?

Sorry if these are trivial questions, but could somebody, please,
enlighten me on these points? Many thanks for any input.

--
Kazimierz T. Kaminski, Ph.D.
Patent Agent ae943@freenet.carleton.ca
InfoSciTech *** Information Consultants tel: (613) 824-9076
Scientific * Technical * Patent Information fax: (613) 824-9562
--IMA.Boundary.351805738
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; name="RFC822 message headers"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Description: cc:Mail note part

Received: from rh2 by iegate.derwent.co.uk with SMTP
(IMA Internet Exchange 1.04b) id 1e6362c0; Fri, 12 Jul 96 12:25:33 +0100
Received: from luggage.tecc.co.uk by rh2.derwent.co.uk with smtp
(SMAIL3.1.28.1#5)
id m0uegUg-0001CNa;Fri, 12 Jul 96 12:34 BST
Received: from luggage.tecc.co.uk by luggage.tecc.co.uk id aa16166;
12 Jul 96 12:10 BST
Received: (majordomo@localhost) by luggage.tecc.co.uk (8.6.12/8.6.12) id MAA16160
for piug-l-outbound; Fri, 12 Jul 1996 12:03:49 +0100
Message-Id: <199607121103.MAA16160@luggage.tecc.co.uk>
Date: Fri, 12 Jul 1996 00:14:30 -0400
From: "Kazimierz T. Kaminski" <ae943@freenet.carleton.ca>
To: piug-l@derwent.tecc.co.uk
Cc: ae943@freenet.carleton.ca
Subject: application number format in WPI on Dialog
Sender: owner-piug-l@derwent.tecc.co.uk
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: owner-piug-l@derwent.tecc.co.uk
--IMA.Boundary.351805738--