RE: patent equiv. for older patents (1954)

Berks, Andrew (andrew_berks@merck.com)
Fri, 12 Nov 1999 09:05:21 -0500

The thread I alluded to on 1950's vintage DE equivalents appeared around
Feb. 24, 1999. The original author was Rossman. I suggest checking that
thread on the archives.

> ----------
> From: Elvin Hoel[SMTP:elhoel@erenj.com]
> Reply To: elhoel@erenj.com
> Sent: Friday, November 12, 1999 5:13 AM
> To: 'Berks, Andrew'; piug-l@derwent.tecc.co.uk
> Subject: RE: patent equiv. for older patents (1954)
>
> Andy,
> I just checked, and both the Derwent and Questel archives are currently
>
> available and up-to-date (Nov 10 for Derwent and Nov 8 for Questel).
>
> Derwent Archives: http://www.derwent.com/archive/piug/
> Questel Archives: http://www.questel.orbit.com/piug/
>
> Regards, Elvin
> Elvin L. Hoel
> Exxon Research & Engineering Co.
> Corporate Research, Information Research & Analysis
> Esso Research Centre, Abingdon; Milton Hill; Oxon OX13 6AE; UK
> Phone: 44-1235-545320 Fax: 44-1235-545323
> Email: elhoel@erenj.com
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Berks, Andrew [SMTP:andrew_berks@merck.com]
> Sent: Thursday, November 11, 1999 8:16 PM
> To: piug-l@derwent.tecc.co.uk
> Subject: RE: patent equiv. for older patents (1954)
>
> I thought I posted a message on this subject about 6 months ago, but I
> couldn't find it on the Questel archive (which seems to have been last
> updated in June) and the Derwent archive seems to be unavailable.
>
>