[PIUG List] Always units - also "new" ones

From: <Peter.Atzmueller_at_voestalpine.com>
Date: Wed, 30 May 2007 14:09:14 +0200

Dear Guido,

I agree with you that a more certain and clear usage of official units (lik=
e the metric system) would make everybodies life easier !

Not only ours but also for the assignees themselves because every possible =
ambiguity of any feature of a claim is also a chance to attack the patent r=
espect. avoiding an infringement of the patent.

Another point I want to state is that also the introduction of new "inventi=
ve" units (usually just a multiplication of the known unit A and the known =
unit B) is - from my point of view - a big problem which leads to patents w=
hich are not really inventive. But at least in some cases they will be gran=
ted because of the new unit which was not mentioned in any state of the art=
 ('cause there was no technological/scientific reason to introduce it).

Maybe the big patent offices should think about their granting policies reg=
arding that point and introduce some (additional) filing rules regarding un=
its.

What is your opinion ?

Best regards and have a nice day,
Peter

________________________________

Peter Atzmüller
Corporate Research
Intellectual Property Rights - Standards - Scientific Journals

voestalpine Stahl GmbH
voestalpine-Straße 3
4020 Linz, Austria
T. +43/50304/15-9114
F. +43/50304/55-9270
M. +43/664 615 59 95
peter.atzmueller_at_voestalpine.com
www.voestalpine.com

voestalpine - One step ahead.

Received on Wed Mar 26 2008 - 23:28:48

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sat Jul 31 2010 - 07:00:37