search wrote:
>I have a trade mark question, for those of you that are familiar with
>this area:
>
>A search using QO trademark explorer - US federal trade marks - found a
>record for US 76437045, which is 'active' according to that database.
>
>A search on the USPTO trade marks database itself did not find a record
>for this trade mark. In fact, a few numbers in this area were missing -
>
>
>76437042
>76437043
>76437044
>76437045
>76437046
>
>All of the above were missing, but numbers either side were available.
>
>The USPTO record for US 76437045 does not appear when searching by
>number or owner, or the words of the mark itself (VITABLAST).
>
>Can anyone suggest a reason for this?
>
>
I cannot tell from your email message which of the USPTO databases you
were using. See the TARR database at
http://tarr.uspto.gov/servlet/tarr?regser=serial&entry=76437042 which
says "Serial number was assigned in error. Please do not use this number
to identify any application. You will receive a "Notice of Incomplete
Trademark Application" explaining why the serial number was held
"misassigned."
It says the same thing for 43, 44, 45, and 46.
Received on Sun Jan 16 2005 - 23:08:09
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Fri Nov 20 2009 - 07:01:21