Re: TM search question

The trademark in question itself is shown as Dead but the number is
different. In fact searching for the Name produces two records both of which
are Dead. Otherwise a search on the Tarr database shows what Carl has
already pointed out. Probably the other database is not updated with the
current info.

See Below:

 Word Mark VITABLAST
Goods and Services (ABANDONED) IC 029. US 046. G & S: Herbal Vitamins
Manufactured Out of Herbs and plant products for consumption by individuals;
fruit drinks and fruit edibles and the like
Mark Drawing Code (5) WORDS, LETTERS, AND/OR NUMBERS IN STYLIZED FORM
Serial Number 76457773
Filing Date October 7, 2002
Current Filing Basis 1B
Original Filing Basis 1B
Owner (APPLICANT) BLASTING JUICES CORPORATION CALIFORNIA 9899 Santa Monica
Blvd. Suite 371 Beverly Hills CALIFORNIA 90210
Type of Mark TRADEMARK
Register PRINCIPAL
Live/Dead Indicator DEAD
Abandonment Date September 25, 2003

N. Ramaswami
Advocate & Patent Agent
H-1/5, Thiruvalluvar Nagar,
Tiruvanmiyur,
Chennai - 600041
Tamil Nadu. India

----- Original Message -----
From: "Carl Oppedahl" <carl_at_oppedahl.com>
To: "search" <search_at_jaws.co.nz>
Cc: <PIUG-L_at_derwent.co.uk>
Sent: Monday, January 17, 2005 2:51 AM
Subject: Re: TM search question


> search wrote:
>
> >I have a trade mark question, for those of you that are familiar with
> >this area:
> >
> >A search using QO trademark explorer - US federal trade marks - found a
> >record for US 76437045, which is 'active' according to that database.
> >
> >A search on the USPTO trade marks database itself did not find a record
> >for this trade mark. In fact, a few numbers in this area were missing -
> >
> >
> >76437042
> >76437043
> >76437044
> >76437045
> >76437046
> >
> >All of the above were missing, but numbers either side were available.
> >
> >The USPTO record for US 76437045 does not appear when searching by
> >number or owner, or the words of the mark itself (VITABLAST).
> >
> >Can anyone suggest a reason for this?
> >
> >
> I cannot tell from your email message which of the USPTO databases you
> were using. See the TARR database at
> http://tarr.uspto.gov/servlet/tarr?regser=serial&entry=76437042 which
> says "Serial number was assigned in error. Please do not use this number
> to identify any application. You will receive a "Notice of Incomplete
> Trademark Application" explaining why the serial number was held
> "misassigned."
>
> It says the same thing for 43, 44, 45, and 46.
>
>
>
> --
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
> Version: 7.0.300 / Virus Database: 265.6.13 - Release Date: 1/16/05
>
>



--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.300 / Virus Database: 265.6.13 - Release Date: 1/16/05

Received on Mon Jan 17 2005 - 09:28:08