Re: Congressional extension of patent

From: Alan <aengel_at_paterra.com>
Date: Fri, 08 Jul 2005 10:48:38 -0400

Stephen,

Thanks. How do the vendors handle these? They are quite rare so do the
vendors bother with them.

Alan

Stephen Adams wrote:

>Hello Alan
>I suspect that this would be classed as an extension under private law.
>If you visit
><http://www.uspto.gov/web/offices/pac/dapp/opla/term/index.html>, you
>will see that there are three sections listing extensions, two under
>different parts of 35 USC and the third under "private law". The column
>headed 'private law' appears to give a citation for a regular Act of
>Congress, of which there only seem to be 3 such instances.
>Stephen
>
>
>

--
The BEST dictionaries produce the BEST translations. <http://www.paterra.com/BestDictionaries.pdf>

InstantMT(r) machine translation of Japanese Patents. http://www.paterra.com

Peace of mind - InstantMT translations are fully copyright cleared.

Free resources for classification-based patent searching:
English: http://cxp.paterra.com
Japanese: http://cxp.paterra.com/jp
Chinese/English search page: http://cxp.paterra.com/cn

Paterra, Inc.
http://www.paterra.com
800-430-5727
610-527-4500


Received on Tue Aug 02 2005 - 11:54:19

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sat Nov 21 2009 - 07:01:11