genetic patent data, standardization and CAMBIA Patent Lens

From: Richard Rouse <rjdrouse_at_patentinformatics.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2005 11:16:52 -0800 (PST)

Whew ....

It was getting old being the only resource that was
integrating all this stuff.

We will start posting code on how to collect this data
for what its worth. For example, here's one way how we
are getting the WIPO stuff.

http://patentinformatics.fdns.net/WIPO/

Hopefully in the end we can establish an official
resource that everyone can rely on. Rather than then
this crazy scattered system that is currently in
place.

I would rather have this stuff accessible through a
service like the Open Patent Service rather then going
through Cambria. Hopefully both options will be
possible.

Richard


--- Nick dos Remedios <nick_at_cambia.org> wrote:

> I use this patent search database but then I am one
> of the
> developers ;-)
>
> We've aimed this resource at users who work in the
> fields of life
> science research, agricultural research, plant
> breeding, biotech, etc.
>
> I would not expect many of the PIUG readers to use
> our database as it
> only contains patents from the life sciences (IPC
> classification
> restricted) and does not yet match up to the pay
> databases that
> professional patent searchers are used to.
>
> Having said that, we are expanding the database to
> all patent
> classifications in 2006. And we have recently added
> some new features
> such as INPADOC legal status and family data. In the
> pipe line is
> relevance ranking, BLAST searching and search
> restriction by patent
> status (in force, lapsed, expired).
>
> Season Greetings
>
> Nick dos Remedios
>
>
> On 20/12/2005, at 3:52 AM, Richard Poynder wrote:
>
> > Dear All,
> >
> > I would be interested in hearing from anyone who
> has used the free
> > Patent
> > Lens database developed by CAMBIA
> > (http://www.bios.net/daisy/bios/patentlens.html).
> >
> > Do patent searchers use this database? If so, how
> does it compare with
> > alternative sources (both free and paid-for)?
> >
> > If patent searchers don't use it, why would that
> be?
> >
> > Any feedback/comments/thoughts gratefully
> received.
> >
> > Best wishes,
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Richard Poynder
> > Freelance Journalist
> > www.richardpoynder.com
> >
> >
> >
> >
>


Received on Tue Dec 20 2005 - 20:25:17

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sun Mar 21 2010 - 07:01:22