Hello,
There are two possibilities to shed light on this problem:
a) someone could capture the network traffic with a packet sniffer and
analyze it, or
b) the author tells the PIUG list what is contained in such a log
Cheers
Michael Engel
----- Original Message -----
From: "Carl Oppedahl" <carl@oppedahl.com>
To: "Cynthia Odonohue" <CynthiaO@mbasis.com>
Cc: <piug-l@derwent.co.uk>; <Farone@appliedpowerconcepts.com>;
<ujihara@aurora.dti.ne.jp>
Sent: Friday, July 26, 2002 6:38 AM
Subject: Re: FW: A reminder about GetIPDL
> See http://www.aurora.dti.ne.jp/~ujihara/GetIPDL/Historyen.html, where the
> author of GetIPDL says:
>
> "I get your logs, which do not contain any patent numbers, to prevent
> indiscriminate downloading."
>
> I think it's pretty likely the author is telling the truth, namely that
the
> logs he obtains do not contain any patent numbers. If so, then Mr. Farone
> might be incorrect to say that it is a log of "everything they do." And
if
> so, then it seems unlikely the author could "make a bundle" selling
> intelligence.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The information contained in this email is confidential and intended
only for the use of the individual or entity named above. If the reader
of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified
that any dissemination, distribution, or copying of this communication
is strictly prohibited. Derwent Information Limited will accept no responsibility
or liability in respect to this email other than to the addressee. If you
have received this communication in error, please notify us
immediately via email: postmaster@derwent.co.uk
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Fri Feb 14 2003 - 11:56:56 GMT